North Carolina DKG Educational Foundation The North Carolina Delta Kappa Gamma Education Foundation
  • Home
  • History
  • Leadership
    • Board of Directors >
      • Contact information
    • Committees
  • Giving
    • HonorandRemember
  • Grants
    • Description of Grants
    • Proposal Form: Continuing Education for Professional/Personal Growth
    • Guidelines for All Grants
    • Proposal Form: Learning/Literacy Project Grant
    • Rubric for Continuing Education Grant
    • Rubric for Learning Literacy Grant
    • Groves-Little Early Career Grant
    • McCall Gifted and Fine Arts
    • Margaret Church Endowment Grant
    • Simmons-Longest Endowment Grant
    • Fall 2020 Grant Recipients
  • Scholarships
  • Endowments
  • Donation Page
  • 101 Challenge!
Provided for information only to those seeking a Continuing Education Grant

2020 - 2021 Scoring Rubric for Continuing Education Grants

​Rubric for Continuing Education Grant
Applicant Number: ________________ Applicant: ___________________________________
Title of Project: ________________________________________________________________
Requested Amount: _______________________ (Item 5 of Proposal) RANK: _________
Rate each section of the proposal by selecting the number that best describes the quality or completeness of the information given. After rating all proposals, rank them highest to lowest as you see their merits. Place RANKING for each in the space above. Give consideration to Innovation (breaking new ground; moving beyond comfort zone), Creativity (moving beyond the norm), Collaboration (involving chapter members, another agency, and/or community members.)
 
_____ 1. Personal Data
               5. Complete
               1. Incomplete
_____ 2. Teaching Experience
               5. Complete
               1. Incomplete
_____ 3. Educational Proposal
               5. Complete
               1. Incomplete
_____ 4. Description of Educational Activity
               5. Superior
               4. Above average
               3. Average
               2. Below average
               1. Deficient  
_____ 5. Itemized Budget
               5. Complete
               1. Incomplete
_____ 6. Evaluation
               5. Superior
               4. Above average
               3. Average
               2. Below average
               1. Deficient
_____ 7. Sharing
               5. Superior
               4. Above average
               3. Average
               2. Below average
               1. Deficient Innovation
_____ 8. References (2 0r 3)
               5. Complete
               1. Incomplete
_____ 9. Publicity
             ( For grant committee use only)
_____ 10. Signature
               5. Signed
               1. Unsigned
 
_______ Total Points
 
_______ Added Value Points for
               Innovation, Creativity, Collaboration
 
_______ Grand Total Points

 
​
Webmaster: Rita Shardell
rshardell@gmail.com

Updated January, 2021