Provided for information only to those seeking a Continuing Education Grant
2019 - 2020 Scoring Rubric for Continuing Education Grants
Rubric for Continuing Education Grant
Applicant Number: ________________ Applicant: ___________________________________
Title of Project: ________________________________________________________________
Requested Amount: _______________________ (Item 5 of Proposal) RANK: _________
Rate each section of the proposal by selecting the number that best describes the quality or completeness of the information given. After rating all proposals, rank them highest to lowest as you see their merits. Place RANKING for each in the space above. Give consideration to Innovation (breaking new ground; moving beyond comfort zone), Creativity (moving beyond the norm), Collaboration (involving chapter members, another agency, and/or community members.)
_____ 1. Personal Data
5. Complete
1. Incomplete
_____ 2. Teaching Experience
5. Complete
1. Incomplete
_____ 3. Educational Proposal
5. Complete
1. Incomplete
_____ 4. Description of Educational Activity
5. Superior
4. Above average
3. Average
2. Below average
1. Deficient
_____ 5. Itemized Budget
5. Complete
1. Incomplete
_____ 6. Evaluation
5. Superior
4. Above average
3. Average
2. Below average
1. Deficient
_____ 7. Sharing
5. Superior
4. Above average
3. Average
2. Below average
1. Deficient Innovation
_____ 8. References (2 0r 3)
5. Complete
1. Incomplete
_____ 9. Publicity
( For grant committee use only)
_____ 10. Signature
5. Signed
1. Unsigned
_______ Total Points
_______ Added Value Points for
Innovation, Creativity, Collaboration
_______ Grand Total Points
Applicant Number: ________________ Applicant: ___________________________________
Title of Project: ________________________________________________________________
Requested Amount: _______________________ (Item 5 of Proposal) RANK: _________
Rate each section of the proposal by selecting the number that best describes the quality or completeness of the information given. After rating all proposals, rank them highest to lowest as you see their merits. Place RANKING for each in the space above. Give consideration to Innovation (breaking new ground; moving beyond comfort zone), Creativity (moving beyond the norm), Collaboration (involving chapter members, another agency, and/or community members.)
_____ 1. Personal Data
5. Complete
1. Incomplete
_____ 2. Teaching Experience
5. Complete
1. Incomplete
_____ 3. Educational Proposal
5. Complete
1. Incomplete
_____ 4. Description of Educational Activity
5. Superior
4. Above average
3. Average
2. Below average
1. Deficient
_____ 5. Itemized Budget
5. Complete
1. Incomplete
_____ 6. Evaluation
5. Superior
4. Above average
3. Average
2. Below average
1. Deficient
_____ 7. Sharing
5. Superior
4. Above average
3. Average
2. Below average
1. Deficient Innovation
_____ 8. References (2 0r 3)
5. Complete
1. Incomplete
_____ 9. Publicity
( For grant committee use only)
_____ 10. Signature
5. Signed
1. Unsigned
_______ Total Points
_______ Added Value Points for
Innovation, Creativity, Collaboration
_______ Grand Total Points